 |
How Auditing Standard 5 Impacts the SOX 404 Project
(Part 1 of 3)
By: Mitchell H. Levine, CISA
-
Audit Serve, Inc.
Audit Serve Seminars
Hidden Secrets from IT Auditors
Pittsburgh January 12, 2009 * Phoenix September
14 - 15, 2009
How to Perform an
Integrated Audit
Boston December 16, 2008 * Tampa February 12, 2009
* Hartford February 18, 2009 * Minneapolis April 6 - 7, 2009
In 2008, most companies are starting
their fifth year of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act and the
industry standard for compliance has been evolving towards more cost
effective measures. During the past two years, companies have
implemented various measures which reduced the overall size of their SOX
404 projects. These project reduction approaches included:
-
Reassessment of controls which
segregated key versus non-key controls
-
Automating the test data collection
and execution processes
-
Documenting test procedures which
allowed for less experienced personnel to be used for SOX testing
reducing the need to hire experienced external SOX consultants
On May 24, 2007, The Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) adopted Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS
5) which replaced its previous internal control auditing standard,
Auditing Standard No. 2. AS 5 is intended to take the final steps to
integrate Internal Control over Financial Reporting with Audit of
Financial Statements. Most importantly, PCAOB has attempted to reduce
the overall effort required to comply with Section 404. However, most
components of AS 5 still requires interpretation and are subjective in
regards to its deployment. This point is further compounded by the fact
there is no consistency between accounting firms, no consistency between
accounting firm partners and no consistency between accounting firm
senior managers.
This three-part article will discuss the
various changes made within AS 5 and how it potentially impacts an
organization’s SOX 404 project.
The following is a summary of the changes
included within AS 5 which will be analyzed individually throughout this
three-part article.
-
Focus the Internal Control Audit on
the most important matters and tailor audits to fit the size and
complexity of the company
-
Emphasis on fraud controls
-
Emphasize importance of the Risk
Assessment which includes a top-down risk based approach
-
Revised definitions which changes the
evaluation and communication of deficiencies
-
Removed requirement for external
auditors to evaluate management’s process
This article will be continued
in the next issue of Audit Vision.
________________ _________________________________________________________
Mitchell Levine is the founder of Audit
Serve, Inc. Audit Serve performs PCI Assessment and Remediation Project
Management consulting services. Audit Serve also conducts Integrated &
IT Audits, SOX Control Design & Testing. Email Mr. Levine at
Levinemh@auditserve.com if you would
like to discuss your organization's specific project requirements in
order to establish a proposal of services.
Copyright 2008, Audit Serve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction, which includes links from other Web sites, is prohibited except by
permission in writing.
This article appeared in a past issue of the Audit Vision
E-Mail Newsletter.
|